Manhattan Project and AGI

A critical essay by P.H. Blöcker I. The Mind That Built the Bomb — and the Mind Now Building AI Steven Pinker opens How the Mind Works (1997) with a deceptively simple thesis: the mind is a computational system, a neural computer shaped by natural selection to solve the adaptive problems our ancestors faced on the ancestral savanna. Cognition, in Pinker's framework, consists of computation over mental representations — the mind represents the world using symbols and data structures, then manipulates these representations using algorithms. This is not a metaphor. It is a structural claim: intelligence, whether biological or artificial, is fundamentally information processing. That claim carries a terrifying implication that Pinker himself has always been careful about: if intelligence is computation, then computation can — in principle — become intelligence. Not the Hollywood robot. Not HAL 9000. Something far more mundane and therefore far more dangerous: a system that processes information faster, at greater scale, with less fatigue, and without the ethical friction that evolution built into human cognition as a survival mechanism. Pinker gave mainstream cognitive science what is known as Moravec's Paradox: as he formulated it as early as 1994, the hard problems of AI are easy, and the easy problems are hard. Chess, mathematics, formal logic — trivial for machines. Recognising a face, navigating a kitchen, understanding irony — extraordinarily difficult. For thirty years this paradox was…

Continue ReadingManhattan Project and AGI

Peter Sloterdijk

This essay was published in German on my WordPress Blog Higher Education before. Here now follows the English version. Prompted by the Author and drafted by Claude AI. Reading Peter Sloterdijk — An Invitation | P.H. Blöcker Faust | God and the Devil | Credit phb Marlow and Goethe | 2 different versions Essay · Philosophy · P.H. Bloecker, retired Director of Studies Reading Peter Sloterdijk — An Invitation by P.H. Bloecker  |  phbloecker.wordpress.com There are books you open and immediately set aside — not because they bore you, but because you sense at once that something is being asked of you. A certain readiness. A kind of inward breath before the dive. Peter Sloterdijk is that kind of author. And that is precisely what makes him indispensable. I say this after more than four decades in the classroom and at the writing desk — in Berlin, in Windhoek, in Queensland. I have watched many philosophical fashions arrive and dissolve. Sloterdijk is not a fashion. He is a space of thought you enter and from which you do not emerge entirely the same. What a Temperament Is His book Philosophical Temperaments — From Plato to Foucault opens with a gesture that is quiet but revolutionary: Sloterdijk does not ask what the great philosophers of history thought. He asks how they experienced the world. What fundamental feeling drives a way of thinking?…

Continue ReadingPeter Sloterdijk

End of content

No more pages to load