The Latin phrase “Scio nescio!” embodies a paradox, an apparent contradiction that reveals a deep truth about human understanding. On the surface, it seems contradictory to assert both knowledge and ignorance simultaneously. However, upon closer examination, we realize that this paradox encapsulates the essence of philosophical inquiry itself.

In its simplest interpretation, “Scio nescio!” implies that we possess some knowledge, yet simultaneously acknowledge the vast expanse of what we do not know. It serves as a reminder of the limitations of human understanding and the humility required in the pursuit of knowledge. It highlights the ever-present potential for growth, learning, and expanding our intellectual horizons.

This paradox also invites us to contemplate the nature of knowledge itself. What does it mean to truly “know”? Is knowledge an absolute certainty, or is it subject to doubt and revision? Can we ever claim complete understanding, or are there always unexplored realms waiting to be discovered? The tension between knowledge and ignorance sparks our curiosity and motivates us to explore, question, and seek new insights.

These questions, among many others, allow us to delve deeper into the profound implications of “Scio nescio!” and its relevance in our quest for knowledge. By embracing the paradoxical nature of this Latin sentence, we invite a more nuanced understanding of the limitations of our knowledge and the ceaseless pursuit of intellectual growth.

The paradigm of “who knows what, at what time, and for what purpose” is indeed crucial in the context of “Cui Bono” and “Scio Nescio”.

In the case of “Cui Bono”, the question of “who benefits?” often requires an understanding of who possesses certain knowledge at a particular time. For instance, in a criminal investigation, knowing who had knowledge of certain facts can lead to the identification of suspects. Similarly, in a business context, organizations might strategically reveal or conceal information based on who stands to benefit.

On the other hand, “Scio Nescio” or “I know that I do not know” emphasizes the importance of recognizing our own limitations in knowledge. It suggests that we should be aware of the timing and purpose of our knowledge acquisition. It encourages intellectual humility and continuous learning, acknowledging that what we know is often dwarfed by what we do not know.

In both cases, the timing, purpose, and subject of knowledge play a significant role. This paradigm not only influences our understanding of the world but also shapes our actions and decisions. 

I know that I know nothing” is a saying derived from Plato‘s account of the Greek philosopher Socrates“For I was conscious that I knew practically nothing…” (Plato, Apology 22d, translated by Harold North Fowler, 1966).[1] It is also sometimes called the Socratic paradox, although this name is often instead used to refer to other seemingly paradoxical claims made by Socrates in Plato’s dialogues (most notably, Socratic intellectualism and the Socratic fallacy).[2]

This saying is also connected or conflated with the answer to a question Socrates (according to Xenophon) or Chaerephon (according to Plato) is said to have posed to the Pythia, the Oracle of Delphi, in which the oracle stated something to the effect of “Socrates is the wisest person in Athens.”[3] Socrates, believing the oracle but also completely convinced that he knew nothing, was said to have concluded that nobody knew anything, and that he was only wiser than others because he was the only person who recognized his own ignorance.


Erich Fromm | Love

“The Art of Loving” by Erich Fromm continues to be relevant and valuable for young scholars for several reasons:

  1. Understanding Love: Fromm’s book provides a deep exploration of the concept of love, going beyond its romanticized portrayal in popular culture. It encourages readers to critically examine their preconceived notions about love and understand it as a complex, multifaceted phenomenon that requires conscious effort and understanding.
  2. Humanistic Perspective: Fromm’s approach to love is rooted in humanistic psychology, which emphasizes the importance of self-awareness, personal growth, and the pursuit of meaningful relationships. This perspective can offer valuable insights and guidance to young scholars interested in psychology, sociology, and interpersonal relationships.
  3. Critique of Modern Society: Fromm critiques the impact of modern society on our capacity to love, highlighting the potential barriers and challenges we face in developing genuine and compassionate relationships. His analysis of consumerism, individualism, and the pursuit of superficial pleasures resonates with contemporary issues faced by young scholars and society as a whole.
  4. Self-Reflection and Personal Development: “The Art of Loving” encourages self-reflection and personal development as a foundation for healthy relationships. Young scholars can benefit from Fromm’s exploration of self-love, the importance of authenticity, and the cultivation of empathy and understanding in their academic and personal lives.
  5. Social and Cultural Context: Fromm’s book also explores the societal and cultural dimensions of love. It provides critical perspectives on gender roles, societal expectations, and the impact of cultural norms on our understanding and experience of love. This can be particularly relevant and enlightening for young scholars studying gender studies, cultural studies, or social sciences.

By engaging with “The Art of Loving,” young scholars can gain a deeper understanding of love as a fundamental human experience and develop insights into its personal, social, and cultural dimensions. The book offers a thought-provoking framework for examining and navigating the complexities of human relationships in both academic and personal contexts.

I know that I do not know is a good start to become an avid reader!

More here soon by author and Blogger P H Bloecker …


Updated Mon 5 Jun 2023

Loop Station South of Cape Town

Reinhardt Buhr

Credit phb | Open AI

Goethe loved many women

Iphigenia is a remarkable character as both a woman and a sister and daughter. She embodies strength, resilience, and a deep sense of loyalty and responsibility towards her family.

As a woman, Iphigenia displays intelligence, compassion, and emotional depth. She is a deeply empathetic character, grappling with the traumas inflicted upon her family and yearning for connection and understanding. Iphigenia’s struggles highlight the challenges and constraints placed on women in ancient Greek society, where their roles were often confined to domestic duties and their agency limited. However, Iphigenia defies these expectations, demonstrating courage and determination in the face of adversity.

As a sister, Iphigenia exemplifies loyalty and devotion. Her reunion with her long-lost brother, Orestes, is a significant moment in her story. Despite the complexities of their family history and the burden of their past actions, Iphigenia embraces her role as a sister, seeking to protect and support Orestes. Her love for him transcends the tragedy that has befallen their family, and she becomes a source of comfort and guidance for him.

As a daughter, Iphigenia carries the weight of her parents’ actions and the consequences of their choices. She represents the hope for redemption and healing in the face of a legacy marred by violence and betrayal. Iphigenia’s journey involves coming to terms with her own identity as a daughter and finding a way to reconcile the conflicting emotions she holds for her parents.

Throughout her story, Iphigenia embodies the resilience and strength of a woman who navigates the complexities of familial relationships. She challenges societal expectations, displays unwavering loyalty, and seeks to find resolution and healing within her family. Iphigenia’s character serves as a testament to the enduring bonds of sisterhood and daughterhood, offering insight into the depths of love and forgiveness that can exist even in the midst of tragedy.

Die deutsche Literatur hat eine reiche Geschichte von bedeutenden Frauen, die als Schriftstellerinnen und inspirierende Figuren einen großen Einfluss hatten. Hier sind einige wichtige Frauen in der deutschen Literatur:

  1. Hildegard von Bingen (1098-1179): Hildegard von Bingen war eine Benediktinerin und eine herausragende mittelalterliche Schriftstellerin. Sie verfasste bedeutende theologische und philosophische Werke sowie lyrische Texte und gilt als eine der ersten bekannten deutschen Autorinnen.
  2. Annette von Droste-Hülshoff (1797-1848): Annette von Droste-Hülshoff war eine herausragende deutsche Schriftstellerin der Romantik. Sie ist vor allem für ihre Lyrik, aber auch für ihre Novellen und Prosawerke bekannt. Ihr Werk zeichnet sich durch eine introspektive Naturdarstellung und eine tiefe psychologische Durchdringung der Figuren aus.
  3. Ricarda Huch (1864-1947): Ricarda Huch war eine vielseitige Schriftstellerin, die Romane, Gedichte, Essays und historische Werke verfasste. Sie zeichnete sich durch ihre kritische Betrachtung von gesellschaftlichen Normen und ihre scharfsinnige Analyse der menschlichen Natur aus.
  4. Ingeborg Bachmann (1926-1973): Ingeborg Bachmann war eine bedeutende österreichische Schriftstellerin, die in deutscher Sprache schrieb. Sie war eine wichtige Vertreterin der Nachkriegsliteratur und bekannt für ihre lyrischen Werke, Erzählungen und Romane, in denen sie komplexe Themen wie Krieg, Identität und Geschlechterdynamik erforschte.
  5. Christa Wolf (1929-2011): Christa Wolf war eine der bekanntesten deutschen Schriftstellerinnen des 20. Jahrhunderts. Sie schrieb Romane, Essays und Kurzgeschichten und war für ihre politisch engagierten Werke und ihre Auseinandersetzung mit der deutschen Geschichte und Identität bekannt.
  6. Herta Müller (*1953): Herta Müller ist eine zeitgenössische deutschsprachige Schriftstellerin und Nobelpreisträgerin für Literatur. Sie ist für ihre intensiven und poetischen Romane bekannt, die sich mit Themen wie politischer Unterdrückung, Minderheitenerfahrungen und Sprache beschäftigen.

Diese Aufzählung repräsentiert nur eine kleine Auswahl der vielen bemerkenswerten Frauen in der deutschen Literaturgeschichte. Jede von ihnen hat auf ihre eigene Weise zum literarischen Kanon beigetragen und das Schreiben und die Position der Frau in der deutschen Literatur maßgeblich geprägt.

To be continued soon by Author Peter H Bloecker, Director Of Studies


Updated on Mon 5 June 2023

Created by DALLe Open AI | Credit phb

Reduction And Philosophy: Simplification

Philosophy encompasses the exploration of fundamental questions about knowledge, existence, and ethics. When it comes to clear and concise text production, philosophy emphasizes the power of reduction to basics. By distilling complex concepts into their fundamental elements, we can communicate ideas effectively.

The process of reduction involves stripping away unnecessary complexities, removing jargon, and focusing on essential principles. This simplification enables us to convey complex thoughts in a concise manner, making them accessible to a broader audience. By distilling intricate ideas into their core components, we can enhance clarity and promote better understanding.

Reduction to basics not only aids in effective communication but also fosters critical thinking. It encourages us to question assumptions, identify underlying principles, and examine the logical structure of arguments. By focusing on the essential elements, we can reveal the core truths or principles that form the foundation of a particular subject.

In the realm of philosophy, reduction to basics can lead to profound insights. By stripping away the superfluous and concentrating on the essential, we can uncover the underlying principles that shape our understanding of reality, morality, and human existence.

With A in July 2023 | #phb

We Are Family | P H Bloecker | Summer 2023 | The Coach